Premises Liability: Legal Definitions for your Premises Lawsuit
Premises liability law involves legal responsibility (“liability”) of a land or property owner in injuries or other damages suffered by persons present on the premises. This article lays out common terms and legal definitions that may apply to your potential premises lawsuit.
Was the Plaintiff an Invitee, Licensee or Trespasser?
Premises law is predicated on the litigant’s presence on the premises in question. This litigant is called the “plaintiff” in legal terms. The property or premises owner is called the defendant for purposes of the premises liability lawsuit.
While a defendant is always a defendant, the plaintiff is not always a plaintiff in premises law. Depending on the defendant’s legal duty to the plaintiff, the plaintiff is commonly titled in three different ways:
Licensee: A licensee was invited by the defendant to remain on or enter the premises in question for any non-commercial purpose. For example, a guest at a party is a licensee.
The owner of a premises is legally responsible for the damage incurred to a licensee if all three of the following circumstances are met:
* The defendant knew or should have known that a dangerous or damaging condition on the premises existed which involved an unreasonable risk of licensee harm, and did not have a reasonable expectation that the licensee would realize that danger to him/herself;
* The licensee did not know, could not have known, or did not have reason to know or realize that the condition and its associated risk(s) existed; and
* The owner did not exercise reasonable care in either rectifying the unsafe condition, or notifying the licensee of the condition and its associated risk(s).
* Invitee: An invitee is invited to remain on or enter the premises in question for commercial purposes, that is, for the defendant’s personal gain or for a reason indirectly connected to the defendant’s business or commercial dealings. For example, a patron of a business, such as a customer at a restaurant, is an invitee. A defendant owes his most stringent duty of care to an invitee as follows:
* The defendant has an obligation to protect or warn an invitee about his or her risks while on the premises if the risk is both unreasonable and the defendant realizes this.
In addition, the defendant may be obligated to periodically inspect the premises for hazards or dangers, such as a routine safety inspection in a store with high shelving.
Trespasser: A trespasser goes on the premises in question without permission of the defendant, not while performing any duty in relation to the premises owner. Defendants typically have no duty or limited duties to warn a trespasser of conditions or dangers that exist on the premises in question. However, a defendant premises owner may be obligated to exercise reasonable or ordinary care in warning a trespasser if he or she is aware that the trespasser is present on the property in question.
What About Contractors or Management Companies?
Non-Delegable Duties: It is typical for the duties of a premises owner to be non-delegable. That is, the presence of a contractor on the premises does not release the defendant from his or her liability in relation to those premises. For example, an apartment owner retains premises liability for that building, even if a management company or janitorial service actually does the repairs at the property.
Watch the video related to legal definition
earth2obama.org April 17, 2009 MSNBC Keith Olbermann
Help answer the question about legal definition
What is the legal definition of date of hire?
I live in Texas and am trying to determine the legal definition of date of hire. The reason I ask is that I received a signing bonus in Nov. 07 that must be repaid if I leave my job voluntarily within 24 months. I started in July 08. Does this mean that 24 months from my date of hire will be Nov. 09 or July 10? Any help is appreciated and a source would be great. Thanks.
About Author
Visit http://www.LegalView.com for more information on premises liability. Also, explore the various other legal topics available through the LegalView site, such as the Singulair side effects, Avandia risks or Chantix recall, at http://chantix.legalview.com/.
Related Videos :
- Kimkins Diet Scandal Headline Legal News
Entire TV Show www.insiderexclusive.com John E. Tiedt of The Law Office of Tied & Hurd is featured in an exciting, exclusive, in-depth and inside interview, discussing Headline Legal News: Kimkins Diet Scandal. John discusses the case with co-counsel Michael Lee Cohen, a graduate of Harvard Law School and former member of the Harvard Law Review; Dr. Americo view video » - Street Legal 01 Changing of the Guards
Changing of the Guards Sixteen years, Sixteen banners united over the field Where the good shepherd grieves. Desperate men, desperate women divided, Spreading their wings ' neath the falling leaves. Fortune calls. I stepped forth from the shadows, to the marketplace, Merchants and thieves, hungry for power, my last deal gone down. She' s smelling view video » - If Obama is NOT the legal President then are his decisions legal YT CENSORED VIDEO
RIGHT CLICK AND COPY AND SEND TO ALL YOUR CONTACTS www.youtube.com Part 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THIS! If Barrack Obama is not legally entitled to be President of the USA then surely all the decisions and legislation he has made since being in office in null in void! The decisions to implement the laws as regards the view video »
Related News :
- Experts Women are drinking more DUIs are up
It seemed too horrendous even to imagine. But the case of the mother who caused a deadly wrong-way crash while drunk and stoned is part of a disturbing trend: Women in the U.S. are drinking more, and drunken-driving arrests among women are rising rapidly while falling among men. read more » - James Is fights road widening
The town of James Island, whose very existence is subject to a long-delayed state Supreme Court decision, voted Thursday to take a case of its own to court: a challenge to Charleston County’s plans for widening Harbor View Road. James Island Council voted 4-1 to ask for an injunction aga… read more » - Kicking in for the daughter in law
The learned Justices S B Sinha and Cyriac Joseph were strangely silent on how to construe the opposite, that is, if a daughter-in-law were to kick the husband or mother-in-law. Perhaps, that’s what prospective daughters-in-law should be trained in, since the law is silent on it. read more » - Senate confirms nominee
WASHINGTON Sonia Sotomayor won confirmation Thursday as the nation’s first Hispanic Supreme Court justice, a history-making Senate vote that capped a summer-long debate heavy with ethnic politics and hints of high court fights to come. The third woman in court history, she’ll be… read more »